“Aero Precision, Ballistic Advantage, Stag Arms, and VG6 are still open for business, but the well-known firearms brands are now operating through a receivership process while a transition to new ownership moves forward.
…
Receivership is not just corporate housekeeping. It usually means a court-appointed third party is now involved in controlling, protecting, selling, or reorganizing company assets. It can lead to a sale of the business as a going concern, a restructuring, or in worse cases, a wind-down. Right now, the company’s public position is that the brands continue to operate while new ownership is being worked out.

For gun owners, the practical takeaway is simple: expect delays, watch your open orders, and be smart about where your money goes.
…”

ht* tps://www.ammoland.com/2026/06/aero-precision-ballistic-advantage-stag-arms-vg6-receivership/

ht* tps://www.ammoland.com/2026/06/virginia-sb749-crump-katz-state-constitution-gun-rights/

For example, this…. “This bill was first introduced in 2019 following the deadly Virginia Beach mass shooting, in which a gunman attached a suppressor to a .45-caliber handgun before opening fire in a local government office building where he killed 12 people and injured four more. Instead of passing comprehensive gun safety legislation to ensure this never happens again,…”

This mentally ill killer did not go on his rampage because he had a suppressor and gun – that’s not what drives these killers, the weapon is of little importance to them actually, what they want to do is harm and kill and that is what drives them and is of importance to them, that mental illness depravity, and they do not really care how they do it or what they use as long as that driving mental illness depravity is satisfied. And even if he did not have a suppressor he would have still killed or injured the same amount simply because they were all basically in one place in the building and it was easy to move from target zone to target zone and interdict the exits – heck, under those conditions he could have used a knife and still killed/injured the same amount and probably more. In other words, its a false and delusional logic to think a bill ‘banning suppressors’ would prevent a mentally ill killer from inflicting injury or death as they will simply not use a suppressor if they can’t get one but will still pull the trigger (or stab or bludgeon or blow-up) – in reality your bill had nothing to do with with your false claims of ‘common sense’ and ‘gun safety’, it was pure emotionally driven false logic and delusional thinking based and that’s the reason it did not happen and here you are trying it again with the same false logic and delusional thinking.