And another reason oil shipping and other shipping in the Strait of Hormuz has decreased – its because of the blockaid where no ship can go to or exit Iran. Ya see, for many years, almost 70, up until Trump started doing something about Iran and their murderous rampage of terrorism, the majority of shipping in the Strait of Hormuz was to and from Iran. Take those out of the picture and you have decreased shipping in the Strait of Hormuz.

and…another reason oil shipping in the Strait of Hormuz has decreased is because oil shipping is using the Red Sea’s Bab-el-Mandeb Strait to move oil from the Middle East to Asia and its become their main route now.

Awaiting moderation.

“The only evidence you offered to prove your point is your ‘feels’.”

What are you talking about? First of all, it’s common knowledge. Secondly, I previously left a link. Replace the “*” with a “t” and go to that url. That specific url which I have already provided lists attacks on US houses of worship. Per that site (check it yourself), “The majority of the killing incidents, 97%, took place at Christian churches, reflecting the large number of Christian churches in the United States.”

You asked something like: “Christianity (which has more attacks)?” Then followed up with: “Fake news, I provided a reference above that shows there are twice as many attacks on Muslims per capita as opposed to Christians in the US.”

Reread those two lines a few times until you see the mistake. Have you found it yet?

You pivoted straight from raw numbers (where Christians face the overwhelming majority of incidents, as expected given their numbers) to per capita rates for Muslims. That’s a classic moving of the goalposts. I wasn’t even trying to play the “oppression Olympics” with you. That’s how you immediately took it. Then you disparaged Christianity multiple times while defending Muslims, all while claiming to “hate all religion equally.” Plus, previous death rates (not threats or vandalism) were even lower per capita. Maybe (unsure) they aren’t now after you add in the three from yesterday, but the total numbers stand which isn’t even the point. The point was media bias and propaganda.

You can easily look up word frequency in media archives (Google Trends, news databases, etc.). “Islamophobia” gets used orders of magnitude more often than “Christophobia” or “Christianphobia.” The disparity tells you which concerns get amplified and which get minimized.

This isn’t about “feels.” It’s about observable patterns in incidents and coverage. Data from sources like the Family Research Council tracks hundreds of hostility incidents against churches in recent years (vandalism, arson, etc.).

Multiple studies confirm the bulk of house of worship violence hits Christian sites because that’s the vast majority of them, about 94-97% in many datasets.

You seem to have a difficult time with reading comprehension on this. It’s because you’ve been conditioned to react a particular way to certain stimuli. Years of selective propaganda will do that. Have you listened to Yuri Bezmenov’s (Soviet defector) presentation on demoralization? If not, you should check it out. He described how ideological subversion works over decades: education, media, and culture erode the ability to process basic facts. A demoralized person is shown evidence and still can’t assess it properly because the framework is already installed. That’s the tragedy he pointed out.

“My point was the news media’s (propagandists’) use of the word “Islamophobia” out of proportion to attacks“

The only evidence you offered to prove your point is your ‘feels’.

“Christianity (which has more attacks)?“

Fake news, I provided a reference above that shows there are twice as many attacks on Muslims per capita as opposed to Christians in the US.

It’s not surprising that the Abrahamic religions are violently feuding with one another, they are all death cults that originated in Abraham’s incestuous relationship with his sister and rely on human sacrifice and ritual cannibalism.

“And yet indeed she is my sister; she is the daughter of my father, but not the daughter of my mother; and she became my wife.” — Genesis 20:12 (KJV)

What do you mean by “unfair media reporting”? You’ve been conditioned by years of propaganda so you can read words and see something completely different. My point was the news media’s (propagandists’) use of the word “Islamophobia” out of proportion to attacks. If that isn’t propaganda, why wouldn’t they do the same for Christianity (which has more attacks)? Instead, they explain those attacks away and quickly drop the stories.

Miner, you could use logic and understand this and still not care. But you’re so far gone you don’t even understand it. That’s why the propagandists do what they do. Many people are highly susceptible to this kind of conditioning.

Here’s more of that unfair media reporting you’re speaking of, this also must be fake news as well, right?

“3 killed, 2 suspects dead in shooting at San Diego Islamic center
Updated 9:20 pm EDT May. 18, 2026
See our live blog for continuing coverage
SAN DIEGO – At least three adults are dead following a shooting at a San Diego Islamic center, and authorities said there’s “no further threat” to the public as they investigate the incident as a hate crime.”

USA TODAY
https://apple.news/AIrvmeh1FQoyzx9xXdvI-yw

“Search any major outlet. ‘Islamophobia’ appears constantly. It’s a go-to framing for any criticism or incident involving Muslims.”

The term ‘Islamophobia’ was invented by the Muslim Brotherhood as an ideological weapon to silence critics. While the term was first used in 1922, it only became a significant part of our vocabulary in the 1990s.

The Muslim Brotherhood publicized the term as an attempt to criminalize any criticism of their religious and political beliefs by implicitly comparing it to antisemitism. This deceptive ‘symmetry’ with antisemitism allowed them to gain moral advantages from the resulting victimhood status. Like the LGBTQ+ movement does today with their invented terms (i.e. ‘homophobe’, ‘transphobe’) to claim a ‘victim’ status.

Abdur-Rahman Muhammad, a former Islamist, was present at the meeting where Muslim Brotherhood allied members of the International Institute for Islamic Thought (IIIT) decided to ’emulate the homosexual activists who used the term ‘homophobia’ to silence critics.’ The FBI later proved the IIIT and Muslim Brotherhood are allied, the proof has appeared in FBI reports. They revealed that several of the IIIT founders and directors were Brotherhood members. But anyway, hence the term ‘Islamophobia’ was born.

and to add, on the subject of oil above in my post….

Experts Explain Why Good News on Oil Prices Is on the Way – and UAE’s Plan Is One Big Reason.

ht* tps://redstate.com/nick-arama/2026/05/15/trump-vindicated-as-experts-predict-oil-price-drop-n2202375

to add to my above on the ballroom, even if the ballroom were not being built the ‘security structure’ would be and the east wing would have still been torn down to do the security structure. This ‘security structure’ has been planned for a while, even before Trump took office in his second term.