Comments on: Canada Got Only a 12 Percent Compliance Rate In Its Compensated Gun Confiscation Test Run

By: .40 cal Booger

.40 cal Booger — Mon, 19 Jan 2026 21:15:14 +0000

Canada: Liberal Gun Grab Announcement – They Will Rip You Off, They Will Never Stop. [and their deceptive use of terminology, just like our anti-gun uses here in the U.S.]

ht* tps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NQNV-OvHRv4

By: screaminchicken

screaminchicken — Mon, 19 Jan 2026 02:33:52 +0000

In reply to .40 cal Booger. virtually no one will get paid. 750 million (Includes admin costs) budget. The total $ value is probably in excess of 2 Billion Canuckistan fuddlebucks. Its all a scam to find out who has what, since a lot of the guns on the list were not registered. After you've applied and they say there's no more money, they know what you have.

By: screaminchicken

screaminchicken — Mon, 19 Jan 2026 02:27:35 +0000

They didn’t even get that. There were estimated to be about 2000 of the type of guns to be confiscated in the pilot program area. They set the bar artificially low to look good if they got 10% compliance. 25/2000 . 1.25%

By: LampOfDiogenes

LampOfDiogenes — Sun, 18 Jan 2026 15:32:34 +0000

Wow. I had always thought the Canucks were pacifist p*ssies, and I guess this proves it. Even KKKalifornia only got an estimated 3 – 5% compliance with its idiotice “AWB ban”. Canada, like Europe, is royally f*cked.

By: .40 cal Booger

.40 cal Booger — Sun, 18 Jan 2026 14:18:59 +0000

In reply to .40 cal Booger. I don't think people realize the full extent of this if they did the whole thing. This was just a 'test run' to determine resistance so they did not go full thing immediately with arrests and taking stuff anyway if someone says 'no'.

By: .40 cal Booger

.40 cal Booger — Sun, 18 Jan 2026 14:12:24 +0000

In reply to .40 cal Booger. Had this not been a trial run to 'test the waters' there would have been a lot of people being arrested and a lot of dead 'government' people who tried to take the guns when people said 'no'.

By: .40 cal Booger

.40 cal Booger — Sun, 18 Jan 2026 13:26:07 +0000

“…it amounts to compensated confiscation.”

No, it doesn’t. It’s forced confiscation with mandatory participation by threat-coercion.

They say you will surrender your guns to them and they will pay you some amount you are required to accept – but if you refuse they put you in jail and take the guns anyway.

That is not ‘compensated confiscation’, that’s a made up term and such a thing does not exist. There is no ‘compensation’ factor – for property that implies a voluntary joint agreement on part of the gun owner and government for an agreed upon price agreeable to both parties, that does not exist here. Its mandatory and you have no say in what the amount is and if you do not agree to it you go to jail and they take your property anyway. There can be no ‘compensation’ for property when one is under duress by government threat-coercion.